Dan Depew Supervisor Robert
Hertman Chief
of Police
Dear Nieces and Nephews, the following information is of
a sensitive nature and those of you who are prone to disbelief will definitely
be shaking your heads. To tell the story properly, we must first review how we
arrived at the events transpiring today.
Over 10 years ago the Town of Wallkill was in trouble
with the Feds.
“Why, Auntie?” You say.
Because in 2001, there were complaints of (some) members
of the Wallkill Police Department engaging in conduct not befitting a decent human
being, let alone a Police Officer who is supposed to be held to a higher
standard.
This behavior on the part of certain Wallkill PD members
apparently started in the late 1990’s.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/19/nyregion/seeing-lawless-police-behavior-state-files-civil-rights-complaint-against-small.html
The NY Times article (in the quaint way that the NY Times
seems to use whenever they discuss anything outside NYC borders) points out the
following:
“The New York
attorney general's office has filed a federal civil rights complaint yesterday
against the small upstate town of Wallkill, charging that it has failed to
corral a lawless police department whose officers pull over female drivers to solicit
dates, refuse to cooperate with other law enforcement agencies, and
systematically harass their many critics, from town officials to the local
newspaper.”
Solicit dates? These bad cops were SEXUALLY HARASSING
FEMALE CIVILIANS. In the 53 page US District Court, Southern District of NY Complaint
and Jury Demand, (“Complaint”) the words “sexual favors” were added and
also “retaliation”. Women who had been
harassed by these bad cops maybe had the option of not going to Wallkill alone; but
can you imagine the terror of a female resident
of Wallkill who was harassed in such a manner? For a chilling report on the
issue, see this from our local paper: (BTW- We miss Oliver and wish him well!) http://www.recordonline.com/article/20010211/News/302119995
A Federal monitor was appointed (Dean M. Esserman- 2001)
and In 2002 the Times said things were improving:
By this time, Robert Hertman was the police Chief. He was
appointed by the Wallkill Town Board to “Clean things up” and apparently doing
that to the satisfaction of the Federal Monitor at the time.
But in May,
(2002) the Town Board found out that
Hertman failed his civil service test, where 21 other men passed, including two
Wallkill sergeants. http://www.recordonline.com/article/20020726/News/307269999
Because of this, Hertman was appointed for one year supposedly. (He is still Chief in 2015)
The tide turned on Wallkill.
In 2004, the Wallkill Police Department was in violation
of several components of the Federal Consent Decree.
“In a scathing
review, Dean Esserman, the court-appointed federal monitor, faults police Chief
Robert Hertman for lengthy delays in resolving civilian complaints and
recommends an extension of the federal consent decree for another six months.” http://www.recordonline.com/article/20040818/News/308189996
In 2006, PARC (Police Assessment
Resource Center) was asked to “Monitor
first-of-its-kind consent decree between Town of Walkill, New York and New York
State addressing a pattern of abuses of police authority.” http://www.parc.info/wallkill/
“This is still history, Auntie, so why now?”
Because of the recently settled case and an outstanding
case today. Because of a Town Board today, led by Danny Depew, that seems to be
acting like the town board back then, either passively accepting the egregious
behavior or actively condoning it.
Because the man brought into the Wallkill PD to “clean things up”
is (allegedly) engaging in sexual
discrimination and misconduct himself! He has allegedly taken this behavior to
a whole new level and is accused of sexually harassing female police officers! (2012
and 2013). One case was settled, one is still outstanding.
“A second female
police officer is suing the Town of Wallkill and Wallkill Police Department
Chief Robert Hertman, accusing him of sexual harassment.”
Many people dismiss this type of behavior as harmless
because either they have never had it happen to them or perhaps, when they read
about it, each event, taken on its own, doesn’t seem so terrible. “After all,
what’s a hug? He was just being supportive.” (Don’t forget to turn on your
sarcasm meter!)
But if it does happen to you, you see the look in the
perpetrators eyes, you feel the full force of their intimidation and realize
the control that they exert over you. And your level of fear rises. And if it’s
your boss, you start to think how your very livelihood is threatened and maybe
even your well-being. And some events taken on their own may not actually be
that bad but when they are part of a
pattern of behavior they help to create a hostile environment and rise to
the level of harassment. Control and intimidation over time! Undue
influence! This is like a male Human Resources Manager harassing female
employees!!!
Such discriminatory, threatening behavior should not be
tolerated, especially by the very people who are supposed to protect us!!!
Especially by the very people that WE elect to ensure that such things do not
happen!!!
But apparently, not in Wallkill.
Danny has hired an attorney Richard Guertin to conduct a
“impartial” investigation. Guertin interviewed a number of officers but a report
has yet to surface.
These are serious allegations and because of the
sensitivity of the charges, the chief should be suspended with or without pay until all cases are settled; if he is in the role of
Police Chief, he can still (allegedly) continue to intimidate the female officers!
At least Wallkill, you will get a water park. We are so glad
Danny has his priorities in line. Maybe Danny can settle the pending case by providing
the female officers a free pass to the DannyWorld Water Park!
From the Town of Wallkill Re-organization meeting Jan 5
2015
please note that Danny was a Town Councilman 2002-2006
Auntie, the top three on the promotion list for police sergeant in wallkill, 2 are women.
ReplyDeleteNo one has been promoted yet.
DEPEW is a political fraud an should seek employment back with GANDER MT,MAPLES FARM AND SHALOM LAMM,S 501c GLIDER OPERATION OR LAMM,S AMBIT ENERGY OPERATION.Without a doubt DEPEW has his sights set on NEUHAUS chair why else did DEPEW give the indorsement speech for MIKE SWEETON, a slap at BEUHAUS. Be assured Neuhaus,s operatives hold DEPEW in distain an know his ambition is the Neuhaus crown.
ReplyDeleteOmg that would be going from 1 incompetent to another
ReplyDelete